Fine-needle aspiration cytology versus open biopsy for evaluation of chronic epididymal lesions: a prospectiv
Viswaroop B, Johnson P, Kurian S, Chacko N, Kekre N, Gopalakrishnan GScand J Urol Nephrol. 2005;39(3):219-21..
Department of Urology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) with that of open biopsy in the evaluation of chronic epididymal lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty men evaluated for chronic epididymal lesions were studied. Men aged 25 years who did not intend to father any more children and had had local symptoms for 6 weeks were included. Of these 40 men, 23 who satisfied the above criteria were subjected to FNAC and open biopsy. The slides were reviewed by two independent pathologists. The sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of FNAC were compared with the results of open biopsy. RESULTS: Tuberculous epididymitis was the commonest cause of chronic epididymal lesions, followed by non-specific epididymitis, sperm granuloma, epdidymal cyst and normal epididymis. The sensitivity and specificity of FNAC for the diagnosis of tuberculous epididymitis were 87% and 93%, respectively. For the diagnosis of non-specific epididymitis, FNAC was 100% sensitive and 100% specific. The positive predictive value was 87% for the diagnosis of both tuberculous and non-specific epididymitis. CONCLUSIONS: FNAC has an overall sensitivity and specificity of 90% for diagnosing chronic epididymal lesions, with a positive predictive value of 87.5%. It is a valuable tool for evaluating chronic epididymal lesions. We suggest that FNAC should be the first-choice investigation for establishing the histopathological diagnosis of epididymal lesions.
This abstract is being posted for educational purposes, as well as for comment and criticism, by the visitors to the Epididymitis Foundation website (www.EpididymitisFoundation.org ). This abstract is representative of a larger article that is indexed on Medline.
Men's Health Web Ring
SurvivingProstateCancerWithoutSurgery.org
VasectomyFoundation.org
Prostatitis Foundation
( Prostatitis.org)
Disclaimer: Information provided on this web site is for educatonal purposes only. It is not a substitute for, nor can it replace advice from your own physician. The information on this site is not to be used for diagnosing or treating any health concerns that you may have. Testicular torsion, which is a medical emergency can be confused with epididymitis. You must see your own physician for diagnosis and treatment. Furthermore, the information on this site is never guaranteed to be 100% accurate or 100% up to date. All the side effects of mentioned treatments, drugs, surgeries, or therapies cannot always be listed or be known. Errors and omissions may occur in any essay. See a competent physician for your health care needs.
EpididymitisFoundation.org™ Established December 11, 2002
