Suprapubic prostatectomy with a novel catheter.
Links Comment in: J Urol. 2007 Jan;177(1):405; author reply 406. Suprapubic prostatectomy with a novel catheter. Djaladat H, Mehrsai A, Saraji A, Moosavi S, Djaladat Y, Pourmand GJ Urol. 2006 Jun;175(6):2083-6. Links Comment in: J Urol. 2007 Jan;177(1):405; author reply 406. Suprapubic prostatectomy with a novel catheter. Djaladat H, Mehrsai A, Saraji A, Moosavi S, Djaladat Y, Pourmand G. Department of Urology, Mohammadi Hospital, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandarabbas. hoomanj@hums.ac.ir PURPOSE: We evaluated the postoperative morbidity and technical complications of a new handmade catheter used for suprapubic prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 146 patients with lower urinary tract symptoms who had indications for open prostatectomy were enrolled in the study from January 2003 to August 2004. Of the patients 96 were treated with a novel technique without a urethral catheter but with a special handmade cystostomy catheter, while the other 50 underwent the traditional procedure using cystostomy and a urethral catheter. The same surgical team operated on the 2 groups. Clot retention episodes, hemoglobin decreases, irritative symptoms, voiding status after cystostomy removal and incontinence were evaluated postoperatively. Three months later we followed the patients with symptom score, maximum flow rate and cystoscopic examination. RESULTS: Preoperatively mean International Prostate Symptom Score was 31.6 in each group. Postoperatively none of the patients with the novel catheter complained of significant irritative urinary symptoms, clot retention and true or stress urinary incontinence. Of the cohorts 94% were satisfied with voiding but 86% of controls were satisfied. There was no report of urinary tract infection or epididymo-orchitis in the cohorts, while we found epididymo-orchitis in 4 controls (8%). Three months after the operation the mean International Prostate Symptom Score was 4.4 (range 1 to 7) and the mean maximum flow rate was 22.6 ml per second (range 14 to 25) in patients with the novel catheter, and 4.2 (range 1 to 7) and 22.5 ml per second (range 15 to 25), respectively, in those with the traditional catheter. At followup there was no bladder neck contracture but 4 patients (4.1%) showed some degree of membranous urethral stricture. We also noted 7 controls (14%) with urethral stricture. CONCLUSIONS: Transurethral prostate resection has been introduced as the surgical treatment of choice in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. However, open adenomectomy still has a place. Urethral catheter-free suprapubic prostatectomy can be safely applied with a low postoperative risk of infection, incontinence and stricture formation. PMID: 16697808 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Related Links Randomized study of transurethral resection of the prostate and combined transurethral resection and vaporization of the prostate as a therapeutic alternative in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. [J Endourol. 2001] PMID: 11339401 A prospective study of the safety and efficacy of suprapubic transvesical prostatectomy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. [J Urol. 2001] PMID: 11435849 Transurethral electrovaporization-resection of the prostate using the "wing" cutting electrode: preliminary results of safety and efficacy in the treatment of men with prostatic outflow obstruction. [Urology. 1999] PMID: 9886597 Vapor resection: a good alternative to standard loop resection in the management of prostates 40 cc. [J Endourol. 2002] PMID: 12542882 Transurethral needle ablation of the prostate: a urodynamic based study with 2-year followup. [J Urol. 1997] PMID: 9334612 See all Related Articles... Display Summary Brief Abstract AbstractPlus Citation MEDLINE XML UI List LinkOut ASN.1 Related Articles Cited Articles Cited in Books CancerChrom Links Domain Links 3D Domain Links GEO DataSet Links Gene Links Gene (GeneRIF) Links Genome Links Project Links GENSAT Links GEO Profile Links HomoloGene Links Nucleotide Links Nucleotide (RefSeq) Links OMIA Links OMIM (calculated) Links OMIM (cited) Links BioAssay Links Compound Links Compound via MeSH Substance Links Substance via MeSH PMC Links Cited in PMC PopSet Links Probe Links Protein Links Protein (RefSeq) Links SNP Links Structure Links Taxonomy via GenBank UniGene Links UniSTS Links Show 5 10 20 50 100 200 500 Sort by Pub Date First Author Last Author Journal Send to Text File Printer Clipboard E-mail Order .
Department of Urology, Mohammadi Hospital, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandarabbas. hoomanj@hums.ac.ir
PURPOSE: We evaluated the postoperative morbidity and technical complications of a new handmade catheter used for suprapubic prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 146 patients with lower urinary tract symptoms who had indications for open prostatectomy were enrolled in the study from January 2003 to August 2004. Of the patients 96 were treated with a novel technique without a urethral catheter but with a special handmade cystostomy catheter, while the other 50 underwent the traditional procedure using cystostomy and a urethral catheter. The same surgical team operated on the 2 groups. Clot retention episodes, hemoglobin decreases, irritative symptoms, voiding status after cystostomy removal and incontinence were evaluated postoperatively. Three months later we followed the patients with symptom score, maximum flow rate and cystoscopic examination. RESULTS: Preoperatively mean International Prostate Symptom Score was 31.6 in each group. Postoperatively none of the patients with the novel catheter complained of significant irritative urinary symptoms, clot retention and true or stress urinary incontinence. Of the cohorts 94% were satisfied with voiding but 86% of controls were satisfied. There was no report of urinary tract infection or epididymo-orchitis in the cohorts, while we found epididymo-orchitis in 4 controls (8%). Three months after the operation the mean International Prostate Symptom Score was 4.4 (range 1 to 7) and the mean maximum flow rate was 22.6 ml per second (range 14 to 25) in patients with the novel catheter, and 4.2 (range 1 to 7) and 22.5 ml per second (range 15 to 25), respectively, in those with the traditional catheter. At followup there was no bladder neck contracture but 4 patients (4.1%) showed some degree of membranous urethral stricture. We also noted 7 controls (14%) with urethral stricture. CONCLUSIONS: Transurethral prostate resection has been introduced as the surgical treatment of choice in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. However, open adenomectomy still has a place. Urethral catheter-free suprapubic prostatectomy can be safely applied with a low postoperative risk of infection, incontinence and stricture formation.
This abstract is being posted for educational purposes, as well as for comment and criticism, by the visitors to the Epididymitis Foundation website (www.EpididymitisFoundation.org). This abstract is representative of a larger article that is indexed on Medline.
Men's Health Web Ring
SurvivingProstateCancerWithoutSurgery.org
VasectomyFoundation.org
Prostatitis Foundation
( Prostatitis.org)
Disclaimer: Information provided on this web site is for educatonal purposes only. It is not a substitute for, nor can it replace advice from your own physician. The information on this site is not to be used for diagnosing or treating any health concerns that you may have. Testicular torsion, which is a medical emergency can be confused with epididymitis. You must see your own physician for diagnosis and treatment. Furthermore, the information on this site is never guaranteed to be 100% accurate or 100% up to date. All the side effects of mentioned treatments, drugs, surgeries, or therapies cannot always be listed or be known. Errors and omissions may occur in any essay. See a competent physician for your health care needs.
EpididymitisFoundation.org™ Established December 11, 2002
